![]() |
![]()
Sam Stimson, a Global Supplier Quality Engineer with Dell Computer had an important message to share with the attendees at Power 2002 on Lithium-ion safety. Sam’s presentation, “Statistical Control of Critical Processes to Improve Lithium-ion Cell Safety Reliability,” describes a need being fulfilled in the industry. With all the redundant safety devices in and outside of the cell pack, Sam says , “It’s what goes on inside the cell that actually gets you in big trouble.” Not only has the power density of a cell risen since 1995, but the number of defective parts per million (dppm) - cell faults in the field - have also escalated. In the 1999-2000 time frame, the battery community was seeing about one dppm; what that means, Sam explained, is that you have a one in a million chance of something happening to the cell that could create a dramatic happening. Such a happening could be a cell fully venting. Referring to Mr. Takashita’s data in an earlier conference session, Sam mentioned that with 740 million cells produced last year, there could be the probability of having 740 “happenings” that are “not very nice.” Yes, there are standards such as UL, CSA and TUV that various manufacturers are using in their testing, but the industry needs to set their own standards which have even stricter parameters.
![]()
Sam emphasized the critical importance for the industry to begin monitoring some variables. He commented on how notebook systems are taking more power so the cylindrical cell power needs to increase. As the 18650 cell size capacity is increased from 1.8 Ah to 2.0 Ah, the people in the computer industry began to see “happenings” in the field. (See Figure 1.) Seeing cells beginning to vent is a dramatic event where cells encapsulated in plastic in a battery pack have “stuff” coming out at 300 0C. Those concerned with batteries and portables want to investigate a regimented process so that this type of venting doesn’t occur.
![]()
Safety in Cell Manufacturing
The following is a list of the ten key considerations and tests that the IEEE committee has felt to be critical in the cell manufacturing process:
- PTC Impedance -XbarR chart - Take many samples to check to see that each cell remains well within the design limits.
- CID Pressure -X bar R chart - Protect the cell from outside forces causing massive current draining so that the cell will not get too hot - possibly vent.
-Nickel plating thickness - Accurate measurements are important because if the plating isn’t heavy enough, it can start chipping off -containments then get in and cause internal shorts.
- Contamination levels in raw material - X bar R chart and
- Contamination levels in mixed material - XBarR chart Lithium cobalt oxide has to be free of iron. Lithium salts and iron do not work well together; in combination they can cause dangerous contamination levels in the mixed materials.
- Yield at Insulation (HiPot) test - Once the jelly roll has been put together, these tests tell you whether you have imperfections in the separator. If such occurs, the anode and cathode can short.
- Electrolyte Weight -XbarR chart - The electrolyte must be measured accurately.
- Plot of Cpk at OCV Test -XbarR - At least three or four Open circuit Voltage (OCV) tests need to taken as the cell is aging.
- Plot of Cpk at IR Test -XbarR chart - The IR will rise if there is contamination
- Plot of Platinum Yield - P Chart - If yields are below 96 percent, something is wrong with the process; there may be contamination.
![]()
These aren’t the ‘Ten Commandments,’ but they are critical areas that need to be monitored by all of the suppliers. Suuppliers give Dell monthly reports on Lot parameters to make sure there are not any variations in cell quality.
![]()
Sam suggested using a Cell Manufacturing FEMA Analysis which encompasses all areas of cell manufacturing (Mechanical Process, Control and Qualification, Test Process and Containments). In review of manufacturing processes for induced cell failures found in the field, one can examine the various areas to lessen any potential of error in a specific point of process. For example, in reviewing the Mechanical Process (including winding, welding, slitting, cutting and assembly) one might need to examine if any dust was found beyond the electrode as a result of slitting. This is a guide for the team at the cell factory; it pinpoints areas which can uncover potential problems.
![]()
Pack Design Initiatives
There are basically six “rules” to consider in creating safe battery packs.
1. Isolate the BMU board
2. Limit the number of wires if possible.
3. Use plenty of tape where soldering can burn insulation of the can.
4. Verify each tab weld.
5. Don’t mix cell batch and test OCV/IR before use. This is a very important point. Once cells leave the cell manufacturing site they go to the pack site and can be there for as long as 30 to 45 days before the pack operation begins. There is going to be a certain amount of degradation in Voltage of the packs, so one needs to be sure that the degradation seen is not more than that which can be attributed to the shipping process. If it is too low, there is internal contamination. Obviously, those cells should not be used at all because their internal resistance is increasing.
6. Keep meticulous records. Be able to track cells all the way back to the batch of materials from which the cells were made.
![]()
The pack should protect the cells. This includes inhibiting charge when cells are full and inhibiting charge/discharge when ambient temperature is too high. The pack design should also protect cells in distress resulting from cell Voltage imbalance and cell over-temperature. Finally, the pack should be isolated from improper conditions such as excessive charge Voltage and current and also excessive discharge current. In the pack design, remember the cell is the critical element.
![]()
Working for Industry Standards
The IEEE P1625 committee sees their Standards development as being all encompassing. Their purpose is “to reduce the incidence of user problems.” Their statement reads, “The portable computer and battery industries need standardized criteria for qualification of rechargeable systems and for verifying the quality and reliability of those batteries.” Through their work they will utilize the current UL, CSA and TUV testing protocols, but they will also provide for failure analysis, establish uniform safety qualification testing and ultimately enhance the customer experience. As Sam reported...” If you look at the various suppliers of lithium rechargeables today, everyone does things a little bit differently when it comes to safety qualifications. “Some test very rigorously, but others do not do so.” The IEEE standard development was described by Sam as a big planar wrapper or umbrella whereby all manufacturers do all of the necessary process control in the same way. One reason Dell, competetors and the major battery manufacturers are putting forth diligent efforts for standardization is to avoid real problems; as Sam says, “the last thing the industry needs is to have a battery vent on an airplane.”
![]()
Thus, a seal of approval that the battery, its pack and total design in a product meets approvals such as the IEEE standards is a necessary step for the industry. Name brand companies want to keep a “five star rating” for the cells, the battery packs and ultimately their the battery-operated products. Perhaps the industry can never say definitely that “an event” with a Lithium-ion battery will never happen. But, in making remarks about the Standards committee, Sam said, “What we want to try to do is move from one ppm to one ppb (part per billion), and we feel that can happen.” And, if an event does happen, at least there will be a monitoring tool in place so that its origin can be traced. That’s something that the industry doesn’t have in place today.
![]()
![]()
(Editor’s note: BD has been promoting Lithium-ion safety since 1997. For some of our articles, see the following issues with hyphenated page numbers: 20-2, 30-4, 32-16, 35-8, 36-14, 39-5, 39-11, 43-11, 49-14, 50-14, 59-2, 65-15, and 77-6.)
![]()
BD
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||